Why Scientific Taste Must Be Learned Through Practice — Edward Hughes

From the creator

Can a machine learn the judgement that separates a plausible-looking result from a faithful experiment? Edward Hughes, Chief Scientist and co-founder of Inherent, joins Tim Scarfe to argue that creativity is not optimisation, and that the missing capability in AI is choosing which questions are worth asking. SPONSOR: --- Cyber Fund built the Monastery to help founders ship products that were impossible a year ago. Apply now: https://cyber.fund --- Edward makes the case that Move 37 was innovative rather than creative, and that the field, not the individual, decides what counts as a discovery. That reframing runs through Csikszentmihalyi, Deutsch and exaptation into open-endedness, where deceptive goals and imperfect world models turn out to be the point rather than the problem. The second half turns to the paper: Replica, a task space built by redacting figures from real papers, and Faraday, a 27-billion-parameter model trained to steer a frontier coding agent that then beats the frontier on held-out replications. --- TIMESTAMPS: 00:00:00 Cold open: Move 37, Faraday and collective intelligence 00:01:08 Sponsor: CyberFund 00:01:46 Inherent's $50M raise and the road from string theory 00:09:14 Three timescales of learning: weights, context, culture 00:13:47 Move 37 was innovative, not creative: the field decides 00:20:39 Creativity as satisficing: the urinal and evolution 00:25:06 Exaptation and the Tristan chord: creativity in context 00:30:56 Coherence for whom? Deutsch's hard-to-vary explanations 00:35:53 Why copying is creative: Deutsch and the constraint engineer 00:42:27 Societies of agents and the strong Moravec paradox 00:45:51 Evaluate in hindsight: from Lean proofs to climate change 00:51:56 Picbreeder, local goals and why discovery needs deception 00:57:21 Spaghetti proofs, translation layers and superhuman Go 01:00:37 Does nature compress? Naturalness and real patterns 01:07:36 Why replicate? Replica's redacted figures and Faraday 01:12:31 Faraday beats Codex, Claude and GLM 5.2 on held-out tasks 01:15:31 Replication to innovation: how the Transformer happened 01:18:26 Deep replication: what Faraday learns from Voyager and GNoME 01:23:37 Can the AI scientist cheat? Goodharting the judge 01:29:09 Inside Replica: scale-down, 8xB300 runs, per-task rubrics 01:34:11 The RL crisis: getting GRPO to work with per-turn credit 01:39:43 Weights vs harnesses: AlphaEvolve, DGM and EvoTune 01:45:45 The recursive company: agents cross a phase transition 01:50:35 Collective intelligence and the electric dynamo 01:55:46 What replaces OKRs? Incumbents and the burden of knowledge --- REFERENCES: organization: [00:01:47] Inherent https://inherentlabs.ai/ other: [00:20:51] Marcel Duchamp, Fountain (1917) https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573 [00:28:25] The Tristan chord https://imslp.org/wiki/Tristan_und_Isolde%2C_WWV_90_(Wagner%2C_Richard) [00:57:33] OpenAI unit distance https://openai.com/index/model-disproves-discrete-geometry-conjecture/ [00:05:19] Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space (Adaptive Agent) https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07608 [00:05:41] Genie https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15391 [00:06:05] The AI Scientist https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06292 [00:12:13] Training AI Scientists to Replicate Research (Replica and Faraday) https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13331 [00:25:42] Open-Endedness is Essential for ASI https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04268 [00:50:30] MAP-Elites https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.04909 [00:50:59] OMNI: Open-endedness via Models of human Notions of Interestingness https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01711 [00:51:01] OMNI-EPIC https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15568 [00:53:42] Picbreeder https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20964537/ [01:17:26] Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473 [01:20:44] Voyager https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16291 [01:21:57] GNoME https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06735-9 [01:34:11] DeepSeekMath https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300 [01:41:29] AlphaEvolve https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13131 [01:41:53] Darwin Gödel Machine https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22954 [01:41:56] Hyperagents https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19461 [01:42:33] EvoTune https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05108 [01:44:46] Evolutionary Principles in Self-Referential Learning https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/diploma.html [01:59:33] Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? https://www.nber.org/papers/w23782 book: [00:16:04] Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention https://search.worldcat.org/title/254487436 [00:26:22] Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-15524-1 [00:33:03] The Beginning of Infinity https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/293575/the-beginning-of-infinity-by-david-deutsch/ [01:55:47] Laws of Knowledge https://www.penguin.co.nz/books/the-infinite-alphabet-9780241655672 --- RESCRIPT: https://app.rescript.info/session/670296ba913761d0?share=6281911cac9bdbff637f10819d4d1e5c

Choose to Build with AI
Matched to AI Agent Systems

AI Maker Residence at KOKO

The third AI workshop taught by our legendary teacher, Nick Sarafa. In one of the last events we did an asset manager raised an additional £25M on their fund within a space of 9 months. This is a full-day hands-on training workshop for purposeful co-creation with AI using Claude Code. Imagine having access to hundreds of billions of dollars of computing power and knowing exactly how to make it work for you through the power of super intelligence. One person did.

◆ Fri 09 Oct 2026 ◆ KOKO Cafe, London ◆ With Nick Sarafa
AI Maker Residence at KOKO
Live event
AI Maker Residence at KOKO
Fri 09 Oct 2026
Find a job · 1 live role

Jobs in AI.
Apply now.

Apply once › get screened › meet the company

See all roles

More like this

Running one yourself?

List your AI event,
wherever it is.

A meetup, a workshop, a hackathon, a conference. Any city, or online. Tell us about it and it lands in front of people already learning this stuff.