Muse Wonder Full (Fully Tested): META's BIGGER MODEL vs Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra & Sol on KingBench 4!

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/@aicodeking/join In this video, I'll put Meta's Muse Wonder Full through the same six KingBench 4 projects as Standard Wonder, using the native Muse CLI with high reasoning: an emulator, a Docker alternative, a 3D room designer, a QMK keyboard configurator, a Pokemon Red recreation and a Fitbit desktop app. I'll go over what Full is, how it's sold, and how it looks on the public benchmarks from Vals and Artificial Analysis, then open every app and test what actually works. After that, we'll look at the final KingBench chart against Standard Wonder, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Haiku 5.5 and GLM 5.3, plus the tokens, estimated cost and generation time. Finally, I'll tell you whether I'd pick Full over Standard Wonder. -- Key Takeaways: 🧠 Muse Wonder Full is a separate variant of Meta's proprietary Muse Wonder family, so picking maximum reasoning on Standard Wonder doesn't switch you to Full. 💸 Full is available through the $50 and $200 a month Muse subscriptions and has no published pay-as-you-go API price. 📊 On the public benchmarks, Vals places Full 5th on its index at 64.57%, and Artificial Analysis gives it 56% on its Intelligence Index. 🎮 The Pokemon Red game is the standout: I played from Pallet Town through a real loss and a real win against Brock, and the badge survived a reload. 🏠 The Atelier room designer is usable, but its feet units, undo, autosave and graphics cleanup have bugs, and it scores 7.0 against Standard Wonder's 7.6. ⌨️ The HiveKey keyboard configurator and PulseBoard fitness app improve the most, but their device protocols and calculated data are still unreliable. ⚠️ The emulator and the Docker alternative stay weak, with a Game Boy core that passes diagnostics but missing DS/3DS work and a storage boundary failure. ✅ Full scores 31.8 out of 60 (53.0%), up about 7.2 points from Standard Wonder's 45.8%, and takes 5th of the seven recorded models. ⚡ Full used about 30.54 million tokens and took around 3.8 times as long to generate, about $17.25 at Standard Wonder's rates versus $10.52. 👍 Full produced a better overall set of apps than Standard Wonder, but no single prompt delivered a finished emulator, container platform or trustworthy health app.