OpenAI COOKED: GPT-6-ASTRA Just DESTROYED Claude in DESIGN
GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1 at website design: I tested Astra in Codex on the Rolls-Royce website prompt I use for my coding-model tests. After criticising OpenAI, this result made me reconsider. In this video, I look at the website it produced, the SVGs, and the approach it took to generate the site from shared data and a template. The part that stood out was the build process. Rather than spending a long time on the task, it created the location data and used a reusable template to produce the pages. I estimate this run took under 10 minutes. I also discuss my experience with Fable 5.1 on the same prompt, which ran for around an hour and 20 minutes and used up my available usage. The design verdict is my opinion from this website test, not a controlled benchmark. This video reviews Astra’s output and discusses my previous Fable 5.1 run; it is not a side-by-side design comparison or a full review of the $20 Codex plan. That plan's usage limits are a separate test I want to do next. Try Harbor, my AI content and SEO tool: https://harborseo.ai/annual Subscribe to Income Stream Surfers for practical AI coding tests and workflow walkthroughs. 00:00 GPT-6 Astra access in Codex and the CLI 00:46 Reviewing the Rolls-Royce website and SVGs 01:29 The build approach that made me reconsider Codex 01:45 My experience with Fable 5.1 on the same prompt 02:01 Building pages from shared data and a template 02:48 The $20 Codex plan and my next test 03:11 Harbor walkthrough and offer 04:46 Closing thoughts #GPT6 #Codex #AICoding ## Tags GPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5.1, AI website design, GPT-6 Astra design, GPT-6 Astra, GPT6 Astra, GPT-6, GPT6, GPT-6 Astra test, GPT-6 Astra review, GPT-6 Codex, OpenAI Codex, Codex, Codex CLI, AI coding, AI website builder, website build test, coding model test, SVG generation, Fable 5.1, Income Stream Surfers
